Home > Help Guides > How to Beat Your Ticket Guide > How to Beat Photo Radar and Red Light Camera Tickets

How to Beat Your Photo Radar and Red Light Camera Citation






(Forward: The information I will share with you in this article is based upon my 20-years of experience as a sworn law enforcement officer and my 18 plus years in the speed counter measurement industry.

However, I am not an attorney nor am I a member of any state bar, so please do not consider any of this information I am sharing with you as legal advice, as I am not in a legal position to offer it.)
Photo Radar Camera
Photo enforcement is big business!

Local, state, and federal governments throughout the world have teamed up with companies like Reflex, American Traffic Solutions, Gatso, and Redspeed to automate various forms of traffic enforcement, including toll enforcement, speed enforcement and red-light camera enforcement.

Most jurisdictions justify their purchase of photo enforcement cameras by citing accident statistics and tout their pursuit of saving lives.

They implement photo enforcement under the guise of preventing accidents in "high-accident" areas, and then claim that these photo enforcement cameras have saved lives and prevented accidents.

They fail to include in their reports that the accidents in these "high-accident" locations are not usually caused by people only going too fast, but other factors possibly combined with speed.

What they do not mention, at least to outside sources, is that it is a great way to make money for the treasury.

The real reason cities use photo radar is for revenue generation.

Cities are able to gain huge amounts of money for little or no cost due to personnel or equipment. Money is also the reason why you sought this information, instead of paying a fine in excess of $400.00, in some cases.
Photo enforcement is a money making tool. The more money it can make without cost to the city the better. To lower the cost to themselves, the city lets the photo-radar company do a lot of the work.

The city contracts companies that specialize in the field of photo radar to maintain and implement the devices.

Then, each day employees from these companies look over the pictures of speeding vehicles taken by the devices and cross-reference the license plate number with the Dept. of Motor Vehicles to see to whom the vehicle is registered.

They then send out a ticket in the mail to the address on record for that person. If the offender looks female, they will send it addressed directly to the female sounding name that is listed on the registration, and vice versa for males.

They send an officious letter, with the ticket, to the registered owner of the vehicle, hoping they have the driver. This letter states that you have been caught on film for speeding. It also gives you four alternatives;

1) Admit guilt and pay the fine,
2) Attend a defensive driving class (at your expense)
3) Request a trial be set by mail
4) Tell them who the actual driver was.

For every ticket that you pay, a percentage goes to the contracted company and the rest goes to the city.

Not a bad arrangement, eh?


Back To Top


How Photo Enforcement Works


All Photo enforcement systems use a computerized photo system.

Radar, Laser or Sensors?

Photo enforcement devices use one of three methods to measure your speed:
  1. Low power radar guns: typically installed in mobile vans/SUVs.
  2. Lidar: used in both fixed and portable locations.
  3. Embedded Sensors: typically used in fixed locations, electronic sensors are embedded into the roadway.

Photo Enforcement Camera System:

Photo enforcement devices use either still digital photography, video photography, or in some cases both, to capture your photograph.

Images Uploaded to Server:


Next, the images captured by the traffic enforcement cameras are uploaded to a central server. Then a technician from the contractor reviews the images and identifies the vehicle through license plate records.

Result: You Ticket is in the Mail

The next step is you receive your citation in the mail. Your summons usually gives three options:
  1. Pay a fine
  2. Go to Traffic School
  3. Appear in court to contest the violation
  4. Identify who the driver is, if it's not you.

What Option Will You Choose?

Pay the Fine


Surprisingly, less then 20% of the people who receive their summons in the mail pays the fine.

However, when you calculate all the people who do mail in their money, along with the high number of summons that are mailed each day, you see why photo camera enforcement has become such a cash cow for many jurisdictions as well as camera contractors.

Go to Traffic School


Some jurisdictions allow you the option of having your citation dismissed by taking either an online or in-person class on driver safety.

Two advantages of this option are that your insurance company is not notified of the offense, and you’ll learn something new about driver safety.

Snitch on the Driver


If you’re not the driver, there is typically an area where you can check off stating that you’re not the driver and then an area where you are asked to identify the driver.

If you check off that you’re not the driver, they will examine your MVD photo against the photo on the citation.

If it’s their determination that it is you, they could then file additional charges against you with the court for providing false information in a public document.

As far as snitching on the driver, at this juncture you’re not under any legal obligation to do so, so you can leave this area black, or write refused.

Fight it in Court.


A small number of people do contest their citation in court.

In these cases the contractor and/or jurisdiction will provide expert witness testimony during your trial on how their system works and the reason(s) you were cited.

Unless you have experience in courtroom procedure and/or hire an attorney, I would not recommend this option on your own.

Most People Ignore the Summons!


Now, most people who receive their ticket in the mail ignore the letter and do nothing.

I’ll explain later why this may be the best option for you to choose if you follow some of my simple guidelines.

Back To Top



Where to Watch Out

Photo Radar Vehicles

Photo Radar Van
Photo Radar vehicles are usually placed in very strategic places, where the police know people usually speed. These areas include school zones, construction zones, and roads where the speed limit is too low for the surroundings.

As these vehicles are portable, they frequently move from place to place, and their locations are not typically stored in the photo enforcement databases.

Most of these photo radar vehicles also use low powered radar guns that are angled away from approaching traffic, making it very difficult for a low-end radar detector to detect.

However, these photo radar vehicles can be detected with a higher end detector such as the Escort Max or the Beltronics STi Magnum.


Fixed Camera Locations


Most of the photo enforcement cameras you will encounter will be fixed location devices.

These fixed location cameras would include toll cameras, red-light cameras, speed enforcement and even smog detection.

Most of these fixed camera locations use embedded sensors placed into the roadway, thus making them impossible to detect with a radar detector.

However, as these are fixed locations, their exact location will be mapped in photo enforcement databases like Escort’s Defender database which is included in the Escort Max and Escort 9500ix radar detector.

Back To Top



Time Limit for Service - Statute of Limitations


Rules of Civil Procedure


The rules of civil procedure vary from state to state; it’s recommended that you check the procedures applicable to your own state/jurisdiction prior to following the tips outlined in this area.

The Civil Procedure Code is in place to protect citizens in all civil cases. It is a part of our justice system designed to protect everyone's rights. It is in place for all civil matters.

Letter in Mail is Not Legal Service


According to the Rules of Civil Procedure (4(i)), if the court fails to effectively summon you within 120 days of filing, it allows the court to dismiss without prejudice (which means that it can be refiled) or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

This loophole cannot be closed without affecting the entire civil justice system.

This means it will probably be in place for some time, at least long enough for you to take care of your citation.

If these conditions have not been met, you have not been served legally. The government agency you are dealing with has the option of sending you registered mail, or having you served personally.

If they send you registered mail you are not required to accept the letter.

You do not have to tell anyone your name just because they ask.

Also, you are not required to accept certified or registered mail.

Simply tell the postman you do not want to accept service of the letter without telling him or her who you are.

If they cannot get you by registered mail, the agency may try to serve you with a civil process server.

Next Comes the Process Server Knocking at Your Door

Door Knocker
If a process server is sent to your home, the situation becomes a little stickier.

The service can be left with any person over 14 years of age in the house and service is valid.

The process server can find out if mail has been received at your address for you and use that to complete the service.

Once you are legally served you must appear in court, end of story.

The other pitfall to this is that the government will likely charge you for the cost of the process server. (Remember, it is a money making proposition for the government.)

To protect yourself from their service, instruct all members of your household not to answer the door if a stranger is standing outside.

Also, if a stranger starts approaching you or any member of your household while outside of your home, have them walk away and not answer any questions if asked.

There have been cases where the process server just stuffs the summons under your door and they leave, marking the summons served.

If this happens to you, you will then have to argue to the court that the service was invalid. However, you may want to wait till after the 120 days of your violation for this hearing.

Back To Top



Fighting Your Citation in Court

Judge
One of the most common mistakes people make when preparing for court is not to prepare.

You must do some thinking about your case and why you are not guilty.

You must also have a plan of attack.

In about eighty percent of the traffic cases I have testified at, the defense of the violator was "Uh-Uh, did not".

Usually, after the officer testifies about date, time, location, weather conditions, circumstances, identity of the driver, other traffic on the road, etc., etc., the defendant tells the judge, "I was not speeding," and sits down.

So who do you think the judge will believe?

Your first step is to identify any problems with the photo enforcement system first.

This means you may have to do more detailed research into exactly how the particular company's system works.

Find out what kind of radar they use, what kind of camera they use, what kind of computer equipment and software is used, and also how the system is linked.

In other words, how is the camera triggered when the radar detects a "speeder"?

Next, find out how the system is maintained.

Subpoena the company's records of service and the maintenance logs for the camera, the radar, and any computer equipment that is used in the system.

Do not be put off by the court or prosecutor. It is your right to subpoena any pertinent evidence in your defense. You might consider getting subpoenas for the maintenance personnel from the company also.


Questions You Need to Ask in Court


Obviously I cannot give a boilerplate set of questions for every court trial or every circumstance that you might encounter.

However, we do give the following examples of questions to give you an idea of how to proceed with your case.

Ask how many failures the company who monitors the system has had.

Don't settle for a percentage or an estimate; make them tell you how many they have had. If they do not keep records on this, it is an indication you can present to the court that the system is flawed to the point that the company does not want anyone to know.

You can also use this information to question the company about their record keeping policies.

If they don't keep records and report problems, how do they know there was no problem with the system when it took the picture?

Question the company about their maintenance policies. You can compare this with the standards recommended by the manufacturer.

Most radar manufacturers have web sites that make this information readily available. Also, find out who is maintaining the photo radar systems and how much training the technicians have had in each phase of the system. You might just find that the technician is well acquainted with radar, but does not fully understand the entire system's functions.

If so, how can he be sure a malfunction did not occur?

One other avenue you might want to explore is who issued the citation.

Find out what information the officer used to determine his reasonable suspicion.

You might find that the officer has less of a basis for a citation than in a normal traffic stop situation. Use this to challenge the issuance of the citation.

The reasonable suspicion is less than the probable cause required by a criminal citation, but it still must be clear and arguable by the prosecutor.

The officer who issues the citation is relying solely on the machine to give him his reasonable suspicion.

This will make it harder for him to articulate his suspicion.

Back To Top




comments powered by Disqus

About Radar Roy



Radar RoyThis site is owned and managed by "Radar Roy," a retired police officer and certified traffic radar instructor, who is considered a leading expert in the speed counter measurement industry.

To learn more about Roy, read his radar detector reviews or download his free radar detector eBook click here.

Return Policy


Dash Mounted Radar Detectors, Accessories, Mounting Systems: These products come with our 30-day money back guarantee provided that they are returned in a resalable condition. This requires that all parts, accessories, warranty cards and all original packaging are returned. Refunds do not include any shipping costs. Products returned that do not include the original outer packaging will be subject to a 10% restocking fee.

Installed Products: Any radar detector/laser jammer product that requires installation is exempt from our 30-day return policy if the product is removed from the packaging and/or if the buyer installs and/or attempts to install the product on a vehicle it becomes a nonreturnable product.

This exception includes all laser jammers, installed radar detectors, and the Veil Stealth Coating.